Wednesday, April 13, 2022

Good Data Means Good Healthcare


 

Dr. Kevin Ciresi is a healthcare executive with more than 28 years of experience. Dr. Ciresi is board-certified and has an interest in value-based care and accurate population data for the best healthcare delivery. During the COVID-19 vaccination implementation, our existing population studies played an essential part in determining which networks and people were treated first. These choices were made utilizing gathered information with a large part of the race and nationality information missing. Significant choices were made without an appropriate portrayal. Also, the absence of equality inside our public health data network prompted a lopsided effect and underestimated groups of people.

For the smartest strategy, we want the best information: information that precisely portrays the differing needs of our networks. The information ought to be both exhaustive and specific so groups within networks can have their particular needs and challenges differentiated from others. We need to be comparing apples to apples, not to all fruits in general if we are to be successful in addressing the needs of the network.

There is much work to be done, however, correction of our present techniques will permit us examination of our networks that can illuminate specific treatment variances. Moreover better attention to population groups and their components can provide better health to all members with recognition of racial and socioeconomic factors. This could be even another step in healthcare being more colorblind.